Taborda Lima & Advogados Associados

Practice areas

Articles

Inadmissibility waiver applications: grounds and case preparation

Understand the main grounds for inadmissibility waiver applications, the applicable requirements and the documentation needed to support the case.

By Cesar Augusto Taborda Lima Immigration 10 min read

The existence of a ground of inadmissibility does not necessarily mean the definitive end of an immigration process to the United States. In certain situations, U.S. law allows the foreign national to apply for a waiver, that is, an exceptional authorization to overcome that impediment and proceed with the visa application, the adjustment of status or admission into the country.

A waiver is not automatic, does not represent a general pardon and does not guarantee the granting of the visa or of the green card. It is a discretionary measure, whose approval depends on the existence of a specific legal provision, on compliance with the applicable requirements and on the quality of the documentation submitted.

The legislation is primarily set out in section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act — the INA —, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1182.

What is a ground of inadmissibility?

Grounds of inadmissibility are situations provided for in the law that may prevent a person from obtaining a visa, from being admitted into the United States or from adjusting their status to lawful permanent resident.

Among the most common grounds are:

  • unlawful presence in the United States;
  • fraud or material misrepresentation;
  • certain criminal records;
  • health-related problems;
  • prior removal or deportation;
  • prior immigration violations;
  • certain charges related to drugs, prostitution or national security;
  • likelihood of becoming a public charge, in specific situations.

Before preparing a waiver application, it is essential to identify exactly which legal provision is being applied to the case. Not every visa denial corresponds to a ground of inadmissibility.

For example, a denial based on section 214(b), generally related to the lack of evidence of temporary intent in nonimmigrant visas, is not resolved by a traditional waiver application. Likewise, a request for additional documents under section 221(g) may represent only a pending documentary matter, and not a definitive inadmissibility. The U.S. Department of State itself distinguishes these situations.

Each ground of inadmissibility has its own rules. The fact that a waiver exists for a certain situation does not mean that it is available for all immigration impediments.

The most frequent applications include:

Waiver for unlawful presence: INA § 212(a)(9)(B)

Unlawful presence of more than 180 days and less than one year may trigger a three-year bar after departure from the United States. Unlawful presence of one year or more may trigger a ten-year bar.

In certain situations, the foreign national may apply for a waiver by demonstrating that a refusal of admission would cause extreme hardship — exceptional suffering or extreme difficulty — to a spouse or parent who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

The application may be filed through Form I-601. When the interested party is in the United States, is undergoing consular processing and seeks to have the unlawful presence impediment reviewed in advance before leaving the country, they may be eligible for Form I-601A.

The Form I-601A is a provisional application. Its approval does not authorize remaining in the country, does not eliminate other grounds of inadmissibility and does not guarantee the issuance of the visa. As a rule, the beneficiary must still depart the United States, appear at the consulate and complete the immigrant visa processing.

Waiver for fraud or misrepresentation: INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i)

Fraud or material misrepresentation to obtain a visa, entry or an immigration benefit may result in permanent inadmissibility.

In immigration petitions, the main ground used is INA § 212(i). Typically, the applicant must demonstrate that a refusal of admission would cause extreme hardship to a spouse or parent who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

It is not enough to state that the family will miss them or will face financial difficulties. It is necessary to demonstrate, with documents and an individualized analysis, how the separation or the relocation of the family to the country of origin would produce consequences significantly greater than the normal hardships arising from a family separation.

USCIS has specific guidance on applications based on fraud and misrepresentation.

Waiver for certain criminal records: INA § 212(h)

INA § 212(h) allows, in specific situations, an application for immigration relief for certain criminal grounds, including some cases related to prostitution, crimes involving moral turpitude and simple possession of a small amount of marijuana.

Eligibility depends on the nature of the crime, on the sentence imposed, on the time elapsed, on the existence of rehabilitation and on the applicant’s family relationship with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

In certain cases, it may be necessary to demonstrate that the facts occurred more than fifteen years ago and that the applicant has been rehabilitated. In other situations, the main requirement will be demonstrating extreme hardship to a qualifying spouse, father, mother, son or daughter.

There are important limitations. INA § 212(h), for example, does not allow a waiver for certain convictions related to murder or acts of torture. In addition, lawful permanent residents who have certain convictions or a certain immigration history may also be barred from using this ground.

Waiver for prior removal or deportation: Form I-212

Form I-212 is used to request authorization to reapply for admission into the United States after a removal order, a deportation or certain immigration violations.

Technically, the I-212 is not a traditional waiver, but an authorization called permission to reapply for admission. This distinction is important because the I-212 does not necessarily replace other applications.

For example, a person may need an I-212 because of a prior removal and, at the same time, an I-601 or an I-601A for unlawful presence or fraud. The approval of one application does not automatically eliminate the other existing grounds.

The instructions and the criteria vary according to the type of removal, the existence of unauthorized reentry, the time elapsed, the procedural status and the location in which the applicant is found. The official information is available on the USCIS Form I-212 page.

Waiver for nonimmigrant visas: INA § 212(d)(3)

The waiver provided for in INA § 212(d)(3) may be used by certain applicants for temporary visas, such as tourism, business, studies or work.

Unlike applications based on extreme hardship, § 212(d)(3) does not, as a rule, require the existence of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident spouse or parent. The analysis is discretionary and considers factors such as:

  • the risk or harm that the admission of the applicant could cause;
  • the seriousness of the ground of inadmissibility;
  • the reason for the trip to the United States;
  • the existence of positive factors;
  • the time elapsed since the facts;
  • the subsequent conduct of the applicant;
  • the importance of the trip to the United States or to the interested party itself.

The application normally begins before the consulate during visa processing. The decision depends on the analysis of the competent authorities of the Department of Homeland Security, after any consular recommendation.

The Department of State explains that waivers are discretionary and depend on the applicable legal ground.

What does “extreme hardship” mean?

The concept of extreme hardship is one of the most important elements of waiver applications based on family ties.

Extreme hardship must be analyzed in relation to the qualifying relative, and not only in relation to the applicant. In other words, the simple statement that the applicant will face difficulties by remaining outside the United States is generally not sufficient.

The analysis must consider two scenarios:

  1. the relative remains in the United States and separation occurs;
  2. the relative accompanies the applicant to the country of origin.

In each scenario, the concrete consequences for the qualifying relative must be assessed, including physical and mental health, financial situation, employment, studies, family responsibilities, access to medical treatment, conditions in the country of destination, community ties and other relevant circumstances.

USCIS advises that the extreme hardship analysis must consider the specific circumstances of each case. The hardship must be demonstrated through a coherent combination of a personal statement, documents and independent evidence.

The existence of children, for example, may be relevant, but the analysis must demonstrate how the effects on the children directly affect the qualifying spouse or parent. The applicant’s own hardship, in isolation, normally does not meet the legal requirement, except in specific categories, such as certain VAWA cases.

How to prepare a waiver application

A well-prepared application should begin with the complete reconstruction of the applicant’s immigration, criminal and personal history.

The documentation normally includes:

Immigration case documents

The passport, prior visas, entry and exit records, Form I-94, USCIS notices, consular denial letters, removal orders, court decisions, petition approvals and National Visa Center documents should be gathered, when applicable.

It is also important to obtain, when necessary, copies of prior proceedings through requests for access to immigration records.

Proof of the family relationship

It is necessary to demonstrate the relationship with the qualifying relative, as well as their U.S. citizenship or lawful permanent residence. Birth, marriage and divorce certificates, naturalization documents, a copy of the green card and other official documents may be used.

The applicant’s statement

The statement should present the facts in chronological order, explain the ground of inadmissibility, accept responsibility where appropriate and clarify any inconsistency existing in prior applications.

An effective statement should not minimize relevant facts nor create an artificially favorable narrative. Contradictions, omissions and accounts inconsistent with official records can seriously compromise the credibility of the application.

Evidence of the exceptional hardship

Depending on the case, the following may be used:

  • medical and psychological reports;
  • history of treatments and prescriptions;
  • employment and income documents;
  • income tax returns;
  • contracts, debts and family expenses;
  • proof of financial dependence;
  • school records;
  • letters from employers, physicians, teachers and family members;
  • evidence of caregiving responsibilities;
  • information on the economic, social or medical conditions of the country of origin;
  • statements from people who know the family situation directly.

Foreign documents must be accompanied by a certified translation into English, in accordance with the requirements of the responsible agency.

Evidence of favorable factors

The analysis should also demonstrate that the applicant deserves a favorable decision. The time elapsed since the facts, rehabilitation, compliance with legal obligations, professional history, payment of taxes, community involvement, family responsibility and the absence of new violations may be relevant.

In criminal cases, complete court records, decisions, proof of compliance with the sentence, certificates of rehabilitation and other documents that allow a proper understanding of what occurred must be submitted.

The application should not consist only of forms and personal documents. In complex cases, it is advisable to submit a legal memorandum that:

  • identifies each ground of inadmissibility;
  • indicates the legal ground for the waiver;
  • demonstrates the applicant’s eligibility;
  • explains which family members are qualifying relatives;
  • organizes the extreme hardship analysis, when required;
  • connects each argument to the evidence submitted;
  • addresses the negative factors transparently;
  • explains why a favorable exercise of discretion is justified.

USCIS states that the waiver applies only to the grounds, facts or events specifically covered by the application. Therefore, the approval of a waiver does not automatically eliminate a different ground of inadmissibility that may be identified later. (USCIS Policy Manual)

Conclusion

Inadmissibility waiver applications require much more than correctly filling out a form. The central point is to build a legally adequate, documented and coherent demonstration that the applicant fits within the legal provision and deserves a favorable decision.

The strategy should begin with the precise identification of the impediment, with the choice of the correct form and with the analysis of the concrete consequences of the inadmissibility. A generic application, based only on emotional statements or on documents without a clear connection to the legal requirements, tends to be insufficient.

On the other hand, when eligibility is correctly established and the evidence is organized around a consistent narrative, the waiver can offer a legal alternative for people who, despite a ground of inadmissibility, still have relevant grounds to seek their entry or regular stay in the United States.

The information in this article is for general and educational purposes. The availability of a waiver depends on the specific facts, on the immigration category, on the applicant’s history and on the legislation in force at the time of the application.

About the author

Portrait of Cesar Augusto Taborda Lima
Cesar Augusto Taborda LimaPartner · OAB/PR 112.654

Partner at Taborda Lima & Advogados Associados, he heads the International Law and Immigration Law Department. LL.M. specialist in international law from Northeastern University, in Boston.

See biography

Share